Top Ten Point Guards for the 2009/2010 Season
Last year was a break-through years for several point guards. Mo Williams and Jameer Nelson both got their first All-Star births, Devon Harris was in the running for Most Improved Player, Derrick Rose and Rajon Rondo both stepped up big in the playoffs and Steve Nash and Jason Kidd were both awarded big contract in the offseason. So which point guards are going to make an impact this season? Here is my list of who I think are going to be the top point guards this season.
Honourable Mention:
Steve Nash and Jason Kidd
Last season I had both Steve Nash and Jason Kidd in my top ten, and though I think they still have some tank in the gas and will make an impact this season, I don’t think they will be two of the ten best point guards, even if they both rank in the top ten in assists (which I imagine they will since they both got big pay-days with their respective teams and will be getting lots of minutes). These guys are still two of the best playmakers, but they won’t be getting the numbers they have in the past and their rebounding and scoring numbers have dipped as well, diluting their overall impact.
Jameer Nelson and Mo Williams
Both these guys had career years with contenders last year, and even though they both broke into the All-Star game last season, I still think the others on this list will bring more to their respective teams. The Magic relied on Turkaglu and Howard last year, and the Cavs rode on the back of LBJ. These guys are not the Scottie Pippens and James Worthies of their generation. They are good, even great, but not that great.
Devon Harris
Big fish in a little pond? Perhaps, but he got the ball and minutes in Dallas too, and that was a deep team. Harris will put up great numbers this year, but it will be on a team that doesn’t compete.
Raymond Felton and Russell Westbrook
Both these guys are great young point guards who need to work on their shooting percentages. Felton doesn’t yet have a contract and has competition for minutes in Charlotte, and Westbrook will be good on a young team in the west that will be ill equipped to compete, but both will make solid contributions, even if they don’t get to showcase their talents in competitive playoffs games.
Gilbert Arenas
Perhaps Arenas should be in the top ten, and perhaps there are Washington fans who might even put him in the top three, but I just can’t do that. Like many point guards his field-goal percentage is low, and I could forgive that if he had a solid assist-to-turnover ratio, but he doesn’t. In my book a solid point guard, not a great point guard mind you, but a solid point guard, should hand out at least two assists for each turnover and Arenas has never been able to do that. A great point guard should also be able to hand out 7-10 dimes a game and Arenas is a score-first point guard who has never handed out more than 6.3 assists. Still, there is something about Arenas that helps Washington play better and there is no doubting his athletic ability, but being a scoring point guard, history does not bode well for this Washington team with Arenas at the helm.
10. Mike Bibby
Great vet on a young Atlanta team that will play well and come playoffs I imagine Bibby will make me look stupid for not putting him higher on the list, but I see Crawford and Johnson as the go-to guys for Atlanta this season. Still, Bibby is a vet who has hit big shots for the Kings in the past, and he bring a maturity to the team, as well as solid numbers and the ability to play off the ball. He is a point guard who is comfortable when the shooting guard or small forward bring the ball up and still moves well on the court when he isn’t handling the rock. Arenas may put up higher numbers than Bibby, but Bibby will play into his team and help them achieve more this season.
9. Rajon Rondo
After winning a title with Boston, I thought Rondo’s only real flaw was his midrange jumper. Defenders knew he couldn’t hit it and so dipped behind the pick-and-roll to block him on the drive (that said at least he was smart enough not to take shots he couldn’t hit). Last season though he was hitting them, not as well as some, but well enough to force defences to adjust. Boston was without their star forward in Garnett last year in the playoffs, but Rondo stepped up, had a great battle with Derrick Rose in the first round, averaged a triple-double on the series and played great in the second round as well. His game is so much more complete, he can drive like Tony Parker, dish the ball on the drive, and has improved his mid-range jumper and proved he can help on the boards. He also is one of very few point guards to shoot over .500 from the floor and has balls enough to take the ball to the hole when he knows he’s got an opening despite the fact he’s on the floor with three future HOFers (most young guys would just hand the ball over to Pierce, Allen and Garnett). With a healthy roster next year, Rondo’s improved arsenal will help give Boston one of the best starting-five in the league and rather than being a weak link, he will make the Celtics better.
8. Andre Miller
Even though Miller has never had a high field-goal percentage, I’ve always thought he brought a lot to the court. He helps set up plays for teammates and works hard on defence, and his shooting has only ever hurt teams when they have depended on him for scoring. In Portland he will be required to act as a facilitator. Portland had a 50+ win season last year without a good point guard, and with rising stars like Roy and Aldridge blossoming into All-Stars, Miller will be the perfect point guard to help turn Portland into a true contender and I think will help push them into the playoffs.
7. Jose Calderon
While Mo Williams and Jameer Nelson earned their first All-Star appearances, Jose Calderon continued to go on being underrated. Calderon has high percentages across the board, great three-point shooting (over 40%), field-goal shooting (over 50%) and free-throw shooting (over 98%, and NBA record). He also had one of the top assist averages and an amazing assist-to-turnover ratio (better than 4-1, the best in the league as far as I know, and one of the best ratio’s of all time as far as my memory serves me). He doesn’t have the drive to the basket that Tony Parker and Rondo have, but he’s got a game not unlike Stockton. He shoots when he’s open and looks to set up his teammates and would be a great asset to a contender, but he will still bring a lot to a Toronto team that would be extremely luck to even reach the playoffs. It’s a shame that Calderon wasn’t on a team like Portland or Cleveland, or even Philly where his talents could really shine. I hope Toronto fans appreciate having such a unique talent on their team.
6. Baron Davis
I’ve always been high on Davis, he has had great playoff performances in Goldenstate, and as a member of the Charlotte Hornets, but last year was a big let down for Clippers fans. With a great team on paper, the Clippers were underachievers, playing through injuries while trying to integrate several new players to the system. This year I think will be different. Davis has a year in L.A. under his belt and a great squad on paper with three solid rebounders upfront and some good scorers on the wing. Davis will be a leader on the floor and will likely put up as many triple-doubles as any point guard in the league. Like some other shooting guards, Davis needs to improve his field-goal percentage, but he works the boards, sets up plays and scores 20+ a game. If he can take fewer shots and focus on playmaking, the Clippers will be a contender despite what most sports analysts might suggest. Yes, I said contender. These guys are a lock for the playoffs!
5. Tony Parker
Tony Parker’s numbers may not be as impressive as the numbers put up by Chris Paul or Derron Williams, but he plays on a deep team that shares the ball, and will be this season again. But his ability to drive to the basket gets teammates space to shoot and helps to put points up on the board. He’s got the one of the best shooting percentages on this list, better than 2 assists for each turnover and helps work the boards. The only flaw in his game is his three-point shot, which is endurable since Parker is the point guard to one of the best three point-shooting teams in the league. His inability from beyond the arc will be minimized since his job is to either penetrate and dish, or penetrate and score and so will be a valuable asset to a title contending Spurs team this year.
4. Chauncey Billups
Chauncey Billups was high on my MVP list last year because even though he doesn’t put up the best numbers in the league, he makes teams better. He has the longest consecutive conference finals run going among all current players, he is the best defensive point in the league as far as I can see, he hits big shots (even if his field-goal percentage is low) and his hands out more than 2 assists for each turnover. His impact on the Nuggets alone garners a high spot on this list, and his past accomplishments with Detroit back up his MVP status. Even though he isn’t the best point guard, what he brings to the court and what he inspires in his teammates (defensive efforts and sharing the ball) make him more valuable than his stats suggest.
3. Derrick Rose
Some may suggest that this is a high placement for such a young point guard, especially considering that Kidd and Nash aren’t in my top ten, but after the performance he put up in the playoffs I feel compelled to give him a high ranking, and come the end of the season I imagine that some would suggest Rose is on a par with Derron Williams and Chris Paul. As a rookie Rose did everything right. High field-goal percentage, minimal fouls and a solid assist-to-turnover ratio, and with Ben Gordon off to Detroit the scoring load will be on Rose, who I think will step up. I’m not sure that he will be dethroning the other young point guards who have been dropping jaws the past couple of years, but I anticipate the he will put up numbers that would suggest he is one of the five best point guards in the league.
2. Derron Williams
There is a very small gap between the top two guys on this list as far as I can see, but a gap none-the-less. Williams has one of the better shooting percentages on this list, the 07/08 season saw Williams shoot over 50% from the floor and though he dipped a little bit the following season, it was no doubt in part due to the fact that he had come back from injury and saw defences that could focus on him whilst teammate Carlos Boozer was out with an injury. Last season he handed out a career high 10.7 assists despite a slight reduction in minutes, and saw a career high 19.4 points as well, and Williams is one of those guys who makes improvements on his game each year as he has either remained steady or improved his numbers in; scoring, assists, steals and free-throw percentage each of his first four seasons, and save last season when defences focused on him, has also improved his field-goal percentage as well. He’s also managed to reduce his personal fouls and keep his turnovers low despite increasing assist numbers. And one thing he may have on Chris Paul that may make Williams better equipped for a playoff run is his size. He is a solid 6’3 a point guard, and while there are some who may have an inch on him at that position, they are few and most often not as talented (Billups is the only top ten point guard that is taller than Williams).
1. Chris Paul
Picking between Paul and Williams is hard, but the numbers seem to weigh in Paul’s favour. Paul has a better field-goal percentage, over 50%, which is impressive enough coming from a point guard, but doubly impressive when you consider that Paul is one of the shorter point guards in the league and the little guys usually have a harder time getting a good shot off because it is easy for taller defenders to reach for their shots and alter them. He’s got a decent 3 point shot but doesn’t use it unless he’s open because he knows its not his strong point, he’s great from the line at over 85%, he scores 20+ a game but is a pass first point guard who is an assist shy of a 4-1 assist to turnover ratio (11 assists a game to 3 turnovers). His biggest draw backs are his height, which forces him to give up a lot on defence, and the fact that to impact the game he has to have the ball in his hands. That’s not to say he’s a ball hog because there isn’t a person in the league who loves setting up his teammates more than Paul, but he does need to have the ball in his hand to draw defenders to him in order to get his teammates open. The height he gives up on defence is tough to swallow, but he does make up for it in effort. Charlie Rosen of Fox Sports recently wrote that Paul was overrated, saying his defence is defined by his steals which depends on others mistakes, but that gives no credit to Paul’s hustle which forces opponents to make mistakes. Sometimes he gambles to get the steal, like Iverson or Doug Christie of yesteryear, but for the most part he plays close and forces turnovers, and even if he is waiting for others to make mistakes, no point guard takes advantage of those mistakes better than Paul who lead the league in steals the last two years. Trying to knock Paul for the fact he knows how to exploit the mistakes of his opponents is reaching if you ask me. Rosen also claims that Paul is impotent when double-teamed, but in my opinion that is when Paul plays his best because he is a natural passer who knows his ability to score draws defences in and creates opportunities and open shots for his teammates. I don’t think Paul will be able to play at this level when he hits his 30’s because so much of his game relies on his speed and agility and those things don’t stay for long no matter how great your conditioning is, but his fundamentals will keep him playing at a starting level for well into his 30’s because of his low turnovers, high assists, and great shooting, and for the next couple seasons at least Paul will be the best the league has to offer.